Sure i ordered it in October and it took forever, but it’s finally here. I now have a fitbit
For those of you who don’t know what that is, it’s a little clip you were around. The clip (called a “Tracker”) contains a motion sensor like the ones found in the Nintendo Wii. The Tracker senses my motion in three dimensions and converts this into useful information about my daily activities. The Tracker measures the intensity and duration of my physical activities, calories burned, steps taken, distance traveled, how long it took me to fall asleep, the number of times I woke up throughout the night and how long I was actually asleep vs just lying in bed.
It’s pretty awesome stats and all i have to do is wear this little clip. Also, the clip uploads the data to my Mac without attaching it. All in all, it’s pretty sweet.
One thing i’ve noticed is how nice the web interface is. Entering in foods, water, and stuff is a breeze. Anyway, it’s my first day with this thing. We’ll see how it works. Stay tuned.
I spent a few days at CES and while i didn’t get to walk the floor as much as i had hoped, i did get around enough to figure out what the themes were this year. Here are my thoughts:
Televisions. The TV’s were amazing. In the years past, it had all been about getting bigger and bigger and bigger. This year was different. This year the TV’s got better in different ways. Sure they got bigger. There’s a pic below of a 152″ plasma. It was ridiculous. But the also got thinner, they got 3D, they got wireless – both the video cable and the power cable, and they got Skype. I was a little disappointed that there wasn’t more web on the TV but i guess that time hasn’t come yet.
eReaders. This show was all about the eReader. Last year there were thousands of Netbooks. Now the netbooks are all gone and the eReader has replaced them. The Skiff was the nicest although one of them has the ability to switch from an eReader to an LCD screen with a push of the button. I attribute this all to Android. There’s another reader that’s a full powered Android device with broswing, email and other stuff.
There were also a ton of iPhone accessories there – speakers, cases, grips, remotes, you name it. All in all it was a great show in my opinion – one of the best in years. Anyone else get a different impression?
2009 was a fun year. I traveled to 42 cities, 4 countries and logged over 100k miles. I also found time to stay at home and do stuff. Looking back on the year, some things really stand out. For instance:
Up’s tear-jerking silent vignette. With each new film, Pixar finds some way to top itself. The marvelous innovation inUp was the wordless sequence near the beginning, set to Michael Giacchino’s wistful score, depicting Carl and Ellie’s entire life together — including the sad fact that they can’t have children. Who else would dare to try that? And who but Pixar could pull it off so gracefully?
I Like This Song. I started a little experiment in May of placing a good song i like every day to the blog ilikethissong.com. At first it was easy because there were so many songs i was bursting to share. But as the year wore on, i got more selective and paid more attention to what i was putting up. The real treat, however, has been the followers of ILTS who have sent me new music and tunes.
The Android OS. I went to the largest mobile phone conference in the world last February and saw thousands of phones that were running Windows Mobile OS that was vastly inferior to the iPhone. I came away from there thinking that the iPhone was going to crush everyone for the next 10 years. Luckily Google’s OS has grown up and is the real deal. This is the year when the race for the future of mobile actually started
Brett Favre. Say what you want about him, but for me he has transformed the Vikings from a team that drove me crazy to watch to a team to be proud of every week. He was inspiring and regardless of how early we go out in the playoffs (i’m thinking first round) i’ll always remember this season because of him.
Zach Galifinakis and The Hangover. Zach G. had slipeed under my radar until The Hangover which was this summer’s must-see movie. I thought he made the film and i was even more delighted to see that his webepisodes of Between Two Ferns prove him a true comedic talent
Death of Old Media. Magazines crumbled. Newspapers folded. Online usage soared. People who were in the print business ran scared. Some tried to adjust their print properties. Others just wove a white flag. It become evident this year that online is where the users are and if you’re not moving your media business there, you’re either going to downsize or disappear. This was of personal interest to me as i spent lots of 2009 looking at the advertising piece of this at Buzz and looking at the opportunities this new world creates with Tobes.
In-N-Out burger. I ate so much In-N-Out in 2009 that this could very well be the year of the Double-Double. Thanks to JT, Pedro and JStreet for coming with me time after time after time.
eReaders / Kindle. The Kindle came on strong this year and The Nook is looking like a solid competitor. While neither may be long solutions with their closed formats, they have gained serious attention and sales. I also read my first books on electronically this year and i can easily picture a future when books are primarily sold without paper.
Obama. He came out of nowhere. We were about to elect someone into the Presidency (Hilary) which would have had two families (Clinton’s and Bush’s) control the office for over 24 years. THis was not the America i was down with and i was just about to write off the political system for good when Obama came along. Sure, you can complain about different things he’s done in office thus far but he’s engaged me and he’s made me pay attention. I respect his reasoning. That word, “hope,” is a strange one and it was a big part of 2009 for me due to him.
Avatar, Star Trek and Sci-Fi. This year was an incredible year for sci-fi. I thought Star Trek was awesome, the little indie flick District 9 was refreshing and extremely well done, and of course James Cameron’s epic, Avatar – the film that needed new technology just to complete it – rocked the end of the year. These films showed that sci-fi is alive and kicking and isn’t some little repetitive genre reserved for geeks and nerds.
A Personal Stream of Information From Friends. Before 2009, my RSS feed dominated my web browsing experience. Twitter and Facebook worked their tail off in ’09 to change the web landscape. Their impact has been incredible. The personal stream of information is how many people are now receiving their news and media. What this means is that the web (and possibly life) won’t ever be the same. I can’t wait to see where it leads
D Wood. Last and most importantly it’s D. Say what you will about LA but it brought me to Diane and more than anything it will be a year remembered as the year i met her. That one little meeting has changed everything.
Happy 2009 everyone. It’s been a fantastic year and I wish you all the best in 2010.
Raduchel recently did a post that inspired me to speak up as I’ve been carrying around both an iPhone and a Droid for the past few weeks (since Droid’s launch) and comparing the two. I’ve set the Droid as my main phone so i’m forced to use it more and get used to it. My main findings are:
– In general the iPhone kicks its ass in usability. Typing on the droid sucks so much that i find myself not wanting to send texts. This is especially true in the car. I can text and drive fine with the iPhone but the Droid will cause a crash.
– Having your phone be an iPod is a huge benefit. This is such a major differentiator for me as i listen to a ton of music and listen to podcast every day while driving. The media players on the droid are a joke.
– Google Voice is awesome and i really wish it was on the iPhone. Being able to sync calls and text messages with the web is really useful. There are other GV competitors but they don’t compare for me
– The voice reception and quality on the Droid is heads and shoulders above ATT. I can actually get calls at work and inside my home. I’ve never been an ATT hater but the Droid is making me a Verizon lover.
In general, i think the Droid is pretty great and definitely a competitor to the iPhone but the slickness/enjoyment of the interface and iTunes will keep me on it – at least for the near future.
The world is changing. It is getting smaller, faster, smarter and more accessible. What’s crazy is that some people are bitching that all this technology and change is a bad thing. “Nobody reads anymore” i heard someone say the other day. I do believe that habits are changing due to technology. Mobile phones make it easier to tune out conversations and to not memorize phone numbers. The internet rewards and feeds a short attention span. The question i ask myself is “is this a bad thing?” Chuck Klosterman in his latest book has a whole chapter dedicated to explaining why technology is a bad thing (my thoughts). By i believe he’s equating different to harmful. I recently read this blog post by Steven Johnson where he states:
I think of our present situation as somewhat analogous to the mass migration from the country to the city that started several centuries ago in Europe: the bustle and stimulation and diversity of urban life made it harder to enjoy the slower, organic pleasures of rural living. Still those pleasures didn’t disappear. People continue to cherish them in mass numbers to this day.
I believe this wholeheartedly. Urban life totally disrupted the traditional calm of country life. Today there are plenty who prefer the hustle of the city and many others who prefer to keep it calm in the country. I fully appreciate both. However, i have no patience for people who bash city life (ask my sister about how i attacked her when she started ripping NYC). Large city culture is unique and can be exhilarating, stimulating and inspiring. But it’s existence doesn’t preclude living in the country – just like the internet and technology doesn’t have to render reading and concentrating in large doses obsolete. Don’t fear the change, just recognize it for what it is: another option for your attention.
I saw that Fred did a post on Playdar today. I couldn’t help but comment on it as i am really excited with where it is leading. I’m going to rephrase and expand on my comments here.
Those of you who aren’t familiar with Playdar, let me explain what it is. Playdar is a “Music Content Resolver.” Think a radar for music to play (play+radar = playdar). Now, i’m sure i probably just lost about 50% of my readers there. Those of you who are left, let me explain more in very general terms. Playdar allows a web page or a music service to take a song and then provide a source for that song. If the song is on your local computer it will play that file. If it is on your wife’s computer, it will play from there if it is connected. If it’s no where you specify, it will then look to the internet for the mp3 file. Basically, it will allow you to find any mp3 for any track.
As the co-founder of the music service Qloud I completely understand, respect, and fear the complexity around licensing music. And, any music service that charges users by play (Lala, Launch, etc.) is a challenging consumer experience. Something like Playdar, which allows the user to pay for content he/she doesn’t own and listen from a local (aka legal) location for the rest, could dramatically change the economic model for music services and allow more to experiment.
Even subscription services, which pay the music labels per play would benefit from something like this as many users play the same songs over and over. It might come to a point where once a user plays a track over 70 times the service just gives them the mp3 to download to caps the license fee for that track.
My hope is that many more legal options emerge around Playdar. The new music services of Spotify and MOG are just Rhapsody with more features and a better interface. It’s great to see some more innovation. Can’t wait to see what’s ahead
The value of Wikipedia is the contributors to it. As sites become easier and easier to contribute to, wikipedia remains the nerdiest, most cryptic, most confusing site to add content to. I have a degree in Computer Science and i find it incredibly difficult to find a way to add content to it. I’m not saying i didn’t figure it out, but it was nowhere near simple.
For this reason (and possibly others) wikipedia contributors are on the decline. Does this mean it will not be the dominant site it is today in the future? I wouldn’t surprised. I could see sites like Mahalo picking up the slack. What do you think?
Was watching this video today (below) with the Twitter COO. When asked about the advertising strategy, he says:
You will see an advertising strategy from us in the very near future. And i think that it will be…um…fascinating and completely non-traditional and people will love it…. The genuis of Google when Google first rolled out ads was that the ads were also the kinds of things that people were looking for. So we want to do something that is organic and in the flow of the way people already use twitter and not here are the tweets and here are the ads. So it’ll be very organic. It’ll be very cool and people will love it when they see it.
This is exactly the right strategy. I know from experience as does anyone who’s every tried to sell traffic to ad agencies that the banners are not working. The click-throughs and engagements are low. The IAB unit needs some help and the best way to help is to generate ads organically within the content. What Twitter’s strategy is, i’m not sure but i did see this video today where Steven Fry suggested that tweeters can sell access to their accounts. That would be interesting.
Here’s Twitter COO below. The ad discussion is at 17 minute mark
Just was reading about Google Maps, specifically their turn-by-turn, and its impact on the maps market.
As many people know, there are 2 main players in the map market: Tele Atlas and NavTeq. Google licensed both of them for Google Maps for years. While they licensed, they also sent cars all around the nation gathering their own data. These two guys, Tele Atlas and NavTeq, were the only game in town. TomTom, the leading portable GPS device maker, wanted to control their own destiny and agreed to buy Tele Atlas for US$2.7 billion. And Nokia, worried that they would lose access to the coveted map agreed to buy NavTeq for a cool $8.1 billion.
All was good until Google dropped a bomb. About six weeks ago, they went independent and didn’t rely on either for their map data. And then about a month ago they announced their own turn-by-turn navigation would be available in the Android OS. Now anybody from BMW to GM to Samsung can provide turn-by-turn by simply using Google’s OS.
The big losers here are RIM and iPhone. They either have to not allow that access or pay a large royalty. And Windows Mobile and Symbian are in an even more difficult situation as paying to embed this data could be more than the license fee they get from handset manufacturers. This all assumes, of course, that users really demand this feature. If they do, Google’s really in the catbird seat.
People will complain that this is incredibly anti-competitive. That Google is using it’s money making machine to unfairly compete in the map market. Well, the story is even worse than that. To get carriers to use Android, Google offers a cut on the search revenue that the phones produce. So not only is Android free but it’s actually paying providers to use it. Some people are calling it “less than free.” Google will go beyond cell phones with this strategy. Any netbook manufacturer (Dell, Sony, etc.) will get a cut of search revenue by building on Android or Chrome instead of Windows or Linux. It’s tough to compete with “less than free.”
It makes you think of the world of complements. Chris Dixon discusses Google and how its complement are the web browser and the OS. The best thing you can do as a company is drive your complements to become commodities. Well there’s no better way than driving their prices to be below zero. Kudos Google, I’m impressed.
In the past two weeks, i’ve seen some great movie spoofs. It seems that online video is getting better and better and the content is coming form all over the place. I love these videos. Check ’em out:
A Batman spoof:
A Point Break spoof. I love how Aziz does Keanu by just shouting.
A video describing all the ambiguous endings of movies. If you were unsure how they ended, now you know:
aduchel recently did a post that inspired me to speak up as I’ve been carrying around both an iPhone and a Droid for the past few weeks (since Droid’s launch) and comparing the two. I’ve set the Droid as my main phone so i’m forced to use it more and get used to it. My main findings are:
The world is changing. It is getting smaller, faster, smarter and more accessible. What’s crazy is that some people are bitching that all this technology and change is a bad thing. “Nobody reads anymore” i heard someone say the other day. I do believe that habits are changing due to technology. Mobile phones make it easier to tune out conversations and to not memorize phone numbers. The internet rewards and feeds a short attention span. The question i ask myself is “is this a bad thing?” Chuck Klosterman in 
Fred
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_c.png?x-id=a7ed5638-56af-44b4-b287-5e5b0fd8589e)